CFPB Reiterates its Argument in Remanded Spokeo Case
July 25, 2016
In May, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Robins v. Spokeo, Inc. that a plaintiff has to demonstrate that he or she suffered “concrete” and “real” harm in order to have standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to successfully sue for statutory damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.The CFPB has previously argued that is not necessarily so, and with the SCOTUS remanding the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the bureau has recently reiterated its argument in an amicus brief with the lower court. The specific question in this case is whether the plaintiff (Robins) identified an injury-in-fact under Article III of...