A number of industry trade groups said that CFPB Director Richard Cordray’s determination earlier this year that PHH Corp.’s former mortgage reinsurance activities violated the anti-kickback provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act was wrong and ill-founded on multiple levels. Jointly submitting an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in PHH et al. vs. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the organizations argued that the director’s order cannot be reconciled with RESPA, the bureau’s governing regulations, or longstanding policy guidance. First, the directive contravenes the text, structure and purpose of RESPA Section 8(c)(2) by relegating it to “a mere rule of construction, rather than treating that provision as the exemption to liability that it ...