For years, banks have had a losing record in FHA cases involving False Claims Act allegations. Hence, a federal appeals court’s decision to uphold dismissal of a $2.3 billion lawsuit against a major bank is a rarity. In U.S., ex rel. Advocates for Basic Legal Equality (ABLE) v. U.S. Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an FCA lawsuit against U.S. Bank because the conduct alleged by the qui tam relator had been previously disclosed publicly in a consent order with federal banking regulators. The court held that ABLE’s claims were barred because the conduct that allegedly violated the FCA had already been disclosed when the plaintiff filed suit in 2013. The Department of Justice declined to intervene. The relator suit alleged that U.S. Bank had a practice of initiating foreclosure on FHA-insured mortgages without complying with the ...