Just two institutions – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – end up securitizing the vast majority of conventional home loans, but a large universe of lenders deliver a significantly diverse supply of loans to the government-sponsored enterprises. A new Inside Mortgage Finance special report based on loan-level securities disclosures reveals that 1,848 different institutions delivered single-family mortgages to the two GSEs during the third quarter. They ranged in size from Wells Fargo, which delivered nearly a quarter of mortgages securitized by Fannie and Freddie during the period, to Wisconsin-based Universal Mortgage Corp., which sold one small $39,000 loan to Fannie during the period. The report, GSE Seller Profile: 3Q12, shows...
Read More
Four borrowers from Alabama with adjustable-rate mortgages filed a class-action lawsuit this month against 12 banks that establish the London Interbank Offered Rate. The lawsuit suggests that more than 10,000 borrowers meet the class specifications, which cover loans originated from 2000 through 2009, and that the banks made millions of dollars or even billions due to alleged collusion. “This matter arises from a global conspiracy to fix or set LIBOR – the reference point for setting interest rates on ARMs and other loans – by a cabal of prominent financial institutions,” according to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit is believed to be the first from borrowers regarding LIBOR manipulation. The plaintiffs claim...
Read More
The mortgage lending industry is universally opposed to a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposal to establish a new, more comprehensive “all in” annual percentage rate formula that would include various additional fees and charges. The APR provision is one part of the CFPB’s extensive proposed rule intended to simplify and integrate the mortgage disclosures consumers are entitled to under the Truth in Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The overhaul was mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. In the proposed rule, which came out in July, the bureau would replace...
Read More
Both supporters and opponents of the mortgage interest deduction are laying the groundwork in anticipation of a renewed post-election effort to significantly revise or even outright repeal a staple of middle-class homeownership as Washington is forced to grapple with tax reform and the looming “fiscal cliff.” A number of industry trade groups were reluctant to go on record but industry insiders say they are getting their facts and research together in anticipation of the first serious attempt to repeal the MID in two decades. The most critical factors that will dictate...
Read More
PNC Bank has sued Republic Mortgage Insurance Co. for refusing to pay claims and attempting to rescind coverage on thousands of legacy mortgage loans that came with the bank’s acquisition of National City Corp. in 2008. In a complaint filed in federal district court in Pittsburgh last week, PNC Bank alleged that the North Carolina mortgage insurer refused to honor coverage it sold to National City under a “flow” policy and “pooling” policy between 1989 and 2005 by increasing its rescissions and cancellations. The flow policy provided...
Read More
The number of major fair lending settlements brought by federal regulators over the last year highlights the increasing importance of mortgage lenders properly evaluating their risk of being out of compliance and responding appropriately and preemptively, according to top banking agency officials. Since November 2011, the Department of Justice has settled seven fair lending cases – against Bank of America, Countrywide Financial, GFI Mortgage Bankers, Luther Burbank Savings, Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp., SunTrust Mortgage, and Wells Fargo – mostly related to steering, pricing and underwriting. In the aggregate, these settlements have produced more than $550 million in monetary relief in compensation for more than 250,000 victims, according to Jon Seward, head of housing and civil enforcement for the Justice Department. “All seven cases resulted from referrals” as the regulators are...
Read More
The Supreme Court of the United States has delayed a decision to review a case that rests on the disparate impact theory of discrimination in housing and mortgage lending. The case, Township of Mount Holly, NJ, et al., Petitioners v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al., was listed on the court’s conference schedule at the end of last week, but the justices took no action. Mount Holly is now scheduled to be considered at the court’s next conference on Oct. 26. If certiorari is granted...
Read More