The N.Y. Supreme Court Appellate Division overturned a ruling that dismissed a foreclosure case because attorneys representing the lender failed to meet a deadline for filing a conflict-of-interest document. Judge Arthur Schack dismissed the case brought by U.S. Bank because its attorneys, the now infamous Steven J. Baum law firm, submitted a conflict-of-interest filing 123 days after it was due. The case involved Kelvy Guichardo, a defendant who defaulted on his mortgage. Schack was concerned that there might be a conflict of interest for Steven J. Baum and ordered the law firm to submit an...

President Obama’s contentious recess appointment of Richard Cordray, his nominee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, sets the stage for legal challenges by mortgage lenders affected by actions of the CFPB. One interesting angle that has emerged in discussions with industry attorneys so far is the possibility that, sometime in the future, an aggrieved mortgage lender or servicer that becomes the focus of a CFPB enforcement action could block it by challenging the legality of the action. A company might be able to do so on the basis that the bureau may have acted unlawfully by utilizing an authority it really didn’t have because the CFPB director might not have been legally confirmed by the Senate. “There are issues with this appointment,” said Anne Canfield, executive director of Canfield & Associates, the first of which is the question of whether the Senate is in session or in recess.

The Countrywide Financial legacy continues to sour for Bank of America, which recently was compelled to agree to pay $335 million to settle charges that Countrywide allowed pricing discrimination against African American and Hispanic borrowers, along with unchecked steering to subprime loans, when similarly qualified Caucasian borrowers were given prime loans at lower cost. It’s the largest fair lending settlement to date. This is the first time that the Justice Department has alleged and obtained relief for borrowers who were steered into mortgages because of their race or national origin, government officials said. The settlement – which requires court approval – mandates that Countrywide implement policies and practices to prevent discrimination if it returns to the lending business during the next four years. Countrywide currently operates as a subsidiary of Bank of America but does not originate new loans.

When it comes to contemplating the wide range of mortgage lending compliance challenges in 2012, it might be useful to borrow from former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: there are “knowns,” things we know and things we know we don’t know, and there are “unknowns,” things we don’t know that we don’t know.In terms of some of the “knowns,” the mortgage servicing exam procedures released back in October by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau provide a roadmap for some of the emphasis areas mortgage lenders can expect from their new regulator, according to Christopher Willis, partner in the Atlanta office of Ballard Spahr. “I think fair lending is going to be a very big emphasis area for them,” he said. The recent settlement between the Department of Justice and Bank of America “sets the stage for that to continue to be a very public, very big issue. And that was an origination case; that wasn’t even a servicing case.“And if you read the mortgage servicing exam procedures, the CFPB is saying they want to apply fair lending analysis to things like foreclosures and loan modifications,” he added. “I think that’s going to be a major source of activity.”

Dozens of mortgage lender groups have jointly submitted amici curiae briefs before the Supreme Court of the United States in Magner v. Gallagher, a case in which the high court will address whether the disparate impact theory of discrimination is applicable under the Fair Housing Act or whether plaintiffs have to prove intentional discrimination instead.The Independent Community Bankers of America, the Consumer Mortgage Coalition and the American Financial Services Association argued jointly that proof of discriminatory intent is required to establish a violation of the act.The American Bankers Association, the Consumer Bankers Association, the Financial Services Roundtable and the Housing Policy Council joined dozens of state banking groups to argue that the text of the law provides no basis for claims of disparate impact, and that lenders are not subject to disparate-impact claims under the FHA.The International Municipal Lawyers Association, the National League of Cities and the League of Minnesota Cities sided with the mortgage lending industry...

In Commonwealth Property Advocates LLC v. MERS, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver recently ruled that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. must be granted the right to foreclose.The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that “by the clear language of the deeds of trust, MERS has the authority to foreclose and sell the property on behalf of both the original lender and the ‘lender’s successors.’”The judges rejected all of the plaintiff’s arguments that MERS lacked the authority under state law to foreclose, noting that the Utah Court of Appeals had previously decided this issue and found that MERS has the ability to foreclose and act as the beneficiary on a Utah deed of trust. The court also noted that the Utah Supreme Court declined to review the Utah Court of Appeals case.

California. Late last month, the state Department of Real Estate warned consumers about illegal loan modification schemes and urged victims to submit formal complaints. The most common ploy is for a scammer to guarantee a loan mod in exchange for a fee paid ahead of time (which is against the law in the state), and then to do little or nothing to obtain the loan mod for the borrower once the fee has been paid. The DRE advised consumers who are looking for a loan mod to never pay an upfront fee for such services, and to be wary of guaranteed success. Indiana. The state Department of Financial Institutions recently expanded the purpose of Title 750, Article 9 of the Indiana Administrative Code to conform the mortgage lending regulation to state and federal laws, rules and regulations, as well as policies and guidance from state and federal authorities. The DFI also revised the IAC to specify that an expunged criminal conviction does not result in an automatic denial or revocation of a mortgage lender or originator’s license. However, the underlying facts of the crime at issue can still be considered.

Gibbs & Brun, the Houston-based law firm that spearheaded a massive investor lawsuit against Bank of America, has drawn a bead on Wells Fargo. The company announced this week that its non-agency MBS investor clients have asked two trustees – U.S. Bank and HSBC – to investigate whether ineligible mortgages were pooled in some $19 billion of Alt A and jumbo MBS issued by Wells Fargo between 2005 and 2007. Some 48 securitization trusts are covered by the action, and Gibbs & Brun said it represented investors who collectively held over a quarter of the voting rights in those trusts. “Clients...

Bank of America and the Department of Justice recently agreed to the largest residential fair lending settlement in history – for $335 million. The DOJ claimed that Countrywide Financial allowed pricing discrimination against minority borrowers as well as unchecked steering to subprime loans. The settlement, which is subject to court approval, will mark the first time that the DOJ has obtained relief for borrowers who were steered into loans based on race or national origin. The DOJ said the practice “systematically placed borrowers of color into subprime mortgage loan products while placing non-Hispanic white borrowers with similar creditworthiness in prime loans.” ...

The government-sponsored enterprises’ increased subprime activity in the mid-part of the last decade was driven by compensation incentives for former executives, the Securities and Exchange Commission claims. The allegations were included in recent lawsuits filed by the SEC regarding Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s disclosure of non-prime activity. In December, the SEC filed securities fraud lawsuits against six former GSE executives. The SEC claims the executives – including former Fannie CEO Daniel Mudd and former Freddie CEO Richard Syron – knew of and approved misleading statements in 2007 and 2008 claiming that the companies had minimal holdings of higher-risk mortgages. ...