In a motion to partially dismiss, the CFPB is trying to blunt a challenge by consumer groups over the creation and composition of its consumer financial law task force, arguing they are not directly harmed.
It’s possible the validity and outcomes of pending lawsuits involving enforcement actions will be fact-based and vary case by case, according to attorneys tracking the issue.
The Supreme Court said the president can fire the CFPB director at will but it refused to strike down the entire bureau. The court held that the for-cause provision can simply be severed from the rest of the statute.
The Supreme Court has left to the Ninth Circuit Court to decide whether the civil investigative demand that was the core of Seila Law’s argument could be enforced.
The CFPB is rushing to get certain rulemakings done this year as the presidential election looms. Most items on the CFPB’s to-do list have deadlines in the fall.
Consumer advocacies claim the CFPB task force on consumer financial law does not serve a public interest and has violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act by operating behind closed doors.
The legislation is aimed at replacing the CFPB’s single director with a five-member bipartisan commission. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is close to ruling on the constitutionality of the CFPB.