The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Office of Inspector General is attempting to grow the Finance Agency and the OIG itself into a larger-than-necessary entity, and that is a questionable objective given Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s “uncertain long-term future,” the FHFA head told lawmakers last week.FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco, testifying before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, noted the OIG’s “recurring conclusion” in its recent reports “that the FHFA is understaffed and that it should be more directly engaged day-to-day in the enterprises’ business activities.” That would include independently repeating and validating Fannie and Freddie’s business decisions and calculations.
ABS issuers are scrambling to get a handle on complex new rules to mitigate conflicts of interest in the structured finance market that are being developed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and federal banking regulators. “At the end of the day, we’ll spend lots of time figuring out how to comply,” said Bianca Russo, managing director and associate general counsel at JPMorgan Chase, during a seminar sponsored last week by the American Securitization Forum. “It’s going to be a challenge to comply, however the rules turn out.” Complexity and consistency are...
A reduction to the Federal Home Loan Bank system’s advance business and investment portfolio would diminish Bank profitability, resulting in a credit negative for U.S. commercial banks, according to a recent report by Moody’s Investors Service. “Limiting access to FHLBank funding would reduce alternative liquidity for U.S. banks,” noted the Moody’s report “A Diminished Federal Home Loan Bank System Would Weaken U.S. Banks.”
Unless Congress tackles the future of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the government’s role, if any, in housing finance, expect the Federal Housing Finance Agency to continue to resolutely employ an increasingly imperfect and outdated conservatorship model to the GSEs, say industry observers. Several times while appearing last week before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco pointedly urged lawmakers…
The regulatory burden of the Dodd-Frank Act creates pressure on community banks to hire additional compliance staff instead of customer-facing staff, reducing resources that could be directly applied to serving a bank’s customers, resulting in fewer mortgages getting made, slower job growth and a weaker economy, according to Steve Wilson, the American Bankers Association’s immediate past chairman. The Dodd-Frank provisions he cited as particularly troubling for community banks include risk retention, higher capital requirements, narrower qualifications for capital, and doubling the size of the deposit insurance fund – taking as much as $50 billion out of the earnings and capital of the industry in the process. “The Dodd-Frank Act also requires 20 new Home Mortgage Disclosure Act reporting obligations,” Wilson said in a speech last week. “These and other reporting requirements will add considerable compliance costs to every bank’s bottom line.”
Calls increased last week for Republicans in the Senate to drop their opposition to an up-or-down vote on President Obama’s nomination of Richard Cordray to be the first director of the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. What’s noteworthy is that one Republican in the Senate, Scott Brown from Massachusetts, broke ranks with the rest of his party in saying he supported the nomination. Brown may be feeling the political heat of his challenger for the Senate seat he holds, Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren, the architect of the CFPB and the first special advisor to the Treasury hired to get the new bureau up and running after its creation by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is about to begin its Consumer Risk Assessment process, one of the key components of the agency’s Supervision and Examination Manual. This process evaluates CFPB-supervised entities based on the amount of risk their activities pose to consumers, identifies the various sources of risk, and assesses the quality of risk controls they’ve put in place. This process is definitely something that those who have been concerned about the expansive powers of the bureau should ready themselves for, according to attorneys in the mortgage banking and consumer financial products practice at the law firm of K&L Gates.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in a conciliatory gesture to a wary industry, recently announced the existence of a formal Early Warning Notice process that will provide advance notice of potential enforcement actions to individuals and firms under investigation. The process is modeled on similar procedures that have been successful at other federal agencies, according to the CFPB. It starts with the bureau’s Office of Enforcement explaining to individuals or firms that evidence gathered in a CFPB investigation indicates they have violated consumer financial protection laws. Recipients of an Early Warning Notice are then invited to submit a response in writing, within 14 days, including any relevant legal or policy arguments and facts. The Early Warning Notice process “strikes a balance between the goal of fairness to those being investigated and our mission to protect consumers,” said Raj Date, special advisor to the secretary of the Treasury for the CFPB. “This process will help us fulfill our commitment to transparency in enforcing the law.”
The Government Accountability Office recently confirmed the view widely held in the mortgage finance industry that federal regulators are not doing enough to analyze the cost and other effects of implementing the Dodd-Frank Act. “Little is known about the actual impact of the final Dodd-Frank Act rules, given the short amount of time the rules have been in effect,” the GAO said. The government watchdog noted that federal financial regulators are required to perform a variety of analyses, but the requirements vary and none of the regulators are...
A proposed Senate bill to steadily wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the course of a decade appears to have some support at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, where the acting director is eager for Congress to move toward resolving the three-year-old conservatorships of the two government-sponsored enterprises. S. 1834, the Residential Mortgage Market Privatization and Standardization Act of 2011 would gradually reduce the two GSEs over 10 years through an unusual mechanism. Instead of guaranteeing the entire MBS trust as they...
Is Onity Group eyeing a sale? Perhaps. And why not? Servicing values are approaching a 25-year high.
News Tailored to Your Needs
Get Focused Coverage
Inside Mortgage Finance's newsletters break the mortgage market down so you get the news and data you need most, whether it's total industry coverage or just the news related to securitization, regulation, profits or other specific topics.