No one is suggesting that Wells Fargo will begin lopping off large chunks of its $1.9 trillion residential servicing portfolio in a fashion similar to what Bank of America has done the past two years, but clearly selling mortgage servicing rights is on its to-do list. The big question is how much Wells Fargo is willing to part with. The bank declined to discuss the matter with Inside Mortgage Finance, but confirmed that it seeks to hire what it calls a “project manager” to oversee the effort. A spokeswoman for Wells downplayed the significance of the hire, saying the person who eventually joins the staff will be a “non-executive.” At least four servicing professionals said...

UBS Americas failed in its bid to shut down a lawsuit brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in connection with non-agency mortgage-backed securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while in another case three former Freddie executives lost their own bid to dismiss a Securities and Exchange Commission securities fraud case against them. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week upheld a lower court’s ruling that denied UBS’ motion to dismiss the FHFA’s suit as time barred. In the summer of 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits in Manhattan federal court against UBS and other big banks on behalf of the GSEs, alleging violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 for approximately $200 billion in non-agency MBS sold to Fannie and Freddie.

Decisions by federal regulators have combined to promote issuance of agency MBS over non-agency MBS, a trend that is expected to continue for years to come, according to industry analysts. Panelists at a talk this week sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute cited rules from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau along with pending rules to set requirements for risk retention on MBS issuance and capital requirements for originations and securitization. “Until you know what the rules of the game are going to be...

With banks starting to issue jumbo mortgage-backed securities instead of holding originations in portfolio, the sector has expanded beyond the two nonbanks that propped up non-agency jumbo MBS issuance since 2010. The activity shows favorable economics for non-agency MBS, including tighter spreads on interest rates between conforming mortgages and non-agency jumbos. The average interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate conforming mortgage was 3.596 percent this week, according to Inside Mortgage Finance ...

Ginnie Mae issuance fell in the first quarter of 2013 but was easily offset by significant gains from a year ago, according to Inside FHA Lending’s analysis of FHA data. Mortgage-backed securities production at the government facility dropped 5.1 percent to $104.1 billion in the first quarter but increased 28.6 percent year-over-year , which was more than enough for an offset. The securities were backed mostly by FHA and VA loans with a combined total of $99.33 billion. Federally guaranteed rural housing loans totaling $4.84 billion were also in the mix. Wells Fargo and Chase Home Finance led the Ginnie Mae market with a combined ... [1 chart]

Improving market conditions and strengthening appetites on Wall Street have encouraged a pair of MBS-buying real estate investment trusts to hit up the equity markets, including an initial public offering from relative newcomer First Oaks, which touts a hybrid investment model.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities remained the preferred investment choice of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks during the fourth quarter of 2012, with a slight decrease from the previous quarter, according to a new ranking and analysis by Inside The GSEs based on data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Ginnie Mae securities also posted a negligible decrease within the FHLBank system during the period ending Dec. 31, 2012. GSE MBS accounted for 72.3 percent of combined FHLBank MBS portfolios, down 1.1 percent from the third quarter. The Finance Agency’s data do not separately break out Fannie and Freddie securities.

The majority of financial institutions defending themselves against a massive litigation initiative by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for toxic mortgage-backed securities purchased by the GSEs launched a counteroffensive this week by urging a federal appeals court to intervene in their favor against the “unfair” trial judge. Fifteen banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS Americas, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, filed a joint petition with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York complaining that U.S. District Judge Denise Cote has engaged in a “one-sided” approach designed to force a settlement rather than “foster fair and reasonable determination of the issues.”

Nomura recently made a $78.0 million make-whole payment on one of its non-agency MBS deals that was enough to completely pay off the class A notes and reverse substantial realized losses on the class M1 and M2 securities, according to Barclays Capital. Such loan-level repurchases have been uncommon since topping out at about $6.0 billion in payments in 2007.

A federal judge this week tentatively dismissed most of the claims the National Credit Union Administration filed against Goldman Sachs regarding non-agency mortgage-backed securities. U.S. District Judge George Wu determined that the NCUA’s complaint was untimely unless the federal regulator could prove otherwise, according to an analysis by the Credit Union National Association. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published a preliminary list of counties exempt – in certain circumstances ... [Includes two briefs]