Recent efforts by the government-sponsored enterprises and the Federal Housing Finance Agency to offer clarity and consistency about repurchase demands may or may not bear fruit as neither agency officials nor industry observers can speak confidently as to its ultimate effectiveness. According to participants at an Inside Mortgage Finance webinar this week, the GSE representation and warranty framework unveiled by the FHFA last month and the GSEs’ new quality control guidelines announced last week are steps in the right direction but there are a lot of moving parts to take into account. “We tried the best we could to address...

Advocates for GSE reform say recent actions by the Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency have made it more important than ever for policymakers to start moving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac away from government support or risk seeing the two enterprises enveloped forever within the federal budget. Two former Bush administration Treasury officials made their case this week in a Washington Post opinion piece, citing the government’s recent sale of stock in insurance giant American International Group to recoup the bailout billions Uncle Sam floated the company during the financial crisis as an admittedly inexact blueprint for Congress and the White House to follow to get the feds out of Fannie and Freddie.

More than a year after the Federal Housing Finance Agency first announced its proposal to sell investors Fannie Mae foreclosed properties in bulk for rentals and two months into its second sale with less than 800 properties moved, market watchers are expressing skepticism about whether the program will ever advance beyond the pilot stage. Earlier this month, the FHFA announced that New York-based Cogsville Group LLC was the winning bidder of 94 Fannie-owned properties. The firm paid $2.1 million for a share in a joint venture with the GSE resulting in a transactional value to Fannie of $11.8 million or 86.2 percent of the properties’ estimated value.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has proposed a rule to acquire explicit discretionary authority to require Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or any of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks to undergo a stress test every year, no matter how much the GSEs have in consolidated assets. The proposed rule, published in the Oct. 5 Federal Register, would implement a part of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires certain financial companies with consolidated assets of more than $10 billion, and which are regulated by a primary federal financial regulatory agency, to conduct an annual stress test.

Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s home retention activity declined for the most part during the second quarter of 2012, according to a new analysis of Federal Housing Finance Agency data by Inside The GSEs. Total loss mitigation activity – total home retention efforts and foreclosure alternatives combined – declined 11.4 percent during the second quarter of the year to 190,315. Total loss mitigation for the first six months of the year fell 18.6 percent to 405,127 compared to the same six-month period in 2011.

There is vast room for improvement in how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac manage their deficiency collections following foreclosure but it is the GSEs’ regulator that should provide more “guidance” about how to effectively pursue and collect from strategic defaulters, concluded the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s official watchdog this week.The FHFA Office of Inspector General’s latest audit found that in 2011, Fannie’s and Freddie’s vendors pursued 35,231 deficiency accounts, with a combined value of about $2.1 billion. Of this amount, vendors recouped some $4.7 million, a dismal recovery rate of 0.22 percent.

The legal backlog of cases pending against the GSEs and former company officials got a little shorter following the recent dismissal of two separate federal lawsuits against three defendants. A federal judge in Washington this week dismissed a long-simmering class-action lawsuit against Fannie Mae’s former Chief Financial Officer Timothy Howard brought by investors hoping to recover damages.Two Ohio pension funds – the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, filed suit in 2004 related to a $6.3 billion overstatement of earnings against Fannie and three former GSE executives, including CEO Franklin Raines.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency is looking for feedback on a proposed advisory bulletin which would set forth standards to guide FHFA staff in its supervision of secured lending to insurance company members of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks.The Finance Agency’s advisory bulletin on insurance company collateral, published in the Oct. 5 Federal Register, noted that lending to insurance company members over the last several years has come to represent “an increasingly larger portion” of FHLBanks’ overall business, with several Banks actively targeting this member segment.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have released new guidelines designed to bring more of the two GSEs’ servicing requirements into alignment. The updated policies, both issued Oct. 3, focus on aligning contracts and the enforcement of remedies with seller/servicers in compliance with a Federal Housing Finance Agency directive. “The requirements announced in this bulletin build on the success [of previous announcements], and through our work with Fannie Mae, provide servicers with greater clarity, consistency and transparency across the enterprises on how servicer performance will be measured,” explained Freddie in its announcement.

A federal appeals court has refused to suspend proceedings in the case brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency against one of the non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuers and underwriters for allegedly misrepresenting the deals that were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month made short work of rejecting the motion by UBS Americas to put the suit on hold while the appeals court hears UBS’ appeal of a lower court’s decision not to dismiss the case. “Upon due consideration, it is hereby ordered the motion is denied,” the judges ruled in their terse one-sentence Oct. 1 order.