Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs recent, unambiguous return to profitability will diminish an already waning urgency among Capitol Hill lawmakers to proceed with legislative GSE reform as the companies profits flow into the U.S. Treasury by the billions, industry experts warn. Fannie announced last week that the GSE expects to remain profitable for the foreseeable future after posting record-shattering quarterly and yearly earnings for the period ending Dec. 31, 2012. In the wake of Fannies announcement, the White House this week said that from January 2013 to the end of 2023 the two GSEs could send $183.3 billion to the Treasury.
Freddie Mac this week hired former Chase Home Finance CEO David Lowman to head its single-family division, where he will help shape the GSEs policies and programs that affect seller/servicers. Lowman will officially take the post May 20, the company said. Lowman is joining Freddie at a time of rapidly improving earnings. But he also must deal with several key issues facing seller/servicers, namely tight underwriting standards, changing delivery requirements and continued griping over buybacks. One current colleague of Lowmans amusingly quipped: I wonder what he thinks about buybacks now?
The Home Affordable Refinance Program will continue for another two years as the number of HARP refis for deeply underwater borrowers continued to represent a substantial portion of total HARP volume in January, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced this week. HARP had been scheduled to expire at the end of this year before the FHFAs directive to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to extend the program through Dec. 31, 2015. FHFA determined that extending the program now will provide additional opportunities to refinance, give clear guidance to lenders, and reduce losses for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and taxpayers, said the Finance Agency.
Although Fannie Mae posted stellar and record earnings last week, the best is yet to come thanks to a $58.9 billion allowance for deferred tax assets the GSE is likely to capture when it releases earnings for the first quarter of 2013, a number that will be revealed some time in May. In its 10-K filing for 2012, Fannie did not absolutely say it will move to capture the DTA allowance in the first quarter, but notes that if and when the valuation allowance is released, it will be included as income. The GSE said it did not take the DTA in 2012 because it has not been steadily profitable for a long enough period of time. It noted that the decision was complicated.
GSE single-family securitizations rose just under 1.0 percent during the first three months of 2013, compared to the previous quarter, yet it was the single highest level since the second quarter of 2009 as mortgage lenders delivered $355.8 billion in home loans to Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs securitization programs, according to a new Inside The GSEs analysis. Fannie and Freddie activity peaked in January with GSE volume declining slightly in both February and March. Januarys huge increase compared to the previous month may reflect lenders intent to hold secondary market sales until the new GSE representation and warranties went into effect on Jan. 1.
UBS Americas failed in its bid to shut down a lawsuit brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in connection with non-agency mortgage-backed securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while in another case three former Freddie executives lost their own bid to dismiss a Securities and Exchange Commission securities fraud case against them. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week upheld a lower courts ruling that denied UBS motion to dismiss the FHFAs suit as time barred. In the summer of 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits in Manhattan federal court against UBS and other big banks on behalf of the GSEs, alleging violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 for approximately $200 billion in non-agency MBS sold to Fannie and Freddie.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each received high marks on a relatively easy performance test from the Federal Housing Finance Agency in the GSEs compliance with the FHFAs Conservatorship Scorecard, both companies revealed in their fourth quarter 2012 financial filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In March 2012, the FHFA developed, with input from GSE management, the boards of directors and the companies compensation committees, a set of performance objectives and directed each firm to implement them. The three strategic goals of the scorecard called for the GSEs to build a new securitization infrastructure, contract Fannies and Freddies dominant marketplace presence and maintain foreclosure prevention activities and credit availability for new and refinance mortgages.
Primary market originators and due diligence providers say the elusive market in private placement MBS deals has been gaining strength this year. Were seeing three to five private deals a month, said Jeff Taylor, managing partner of Digital Risk, a New York-based risk management and due diligence firm. As for the underlying product, its across the board, he added. It can be jumbo, nonperforming, and re-performing. But the deals are also much smaller than the rapidly growing public MBS deals. Digital Risk, which conducts due diligence reviews on the underlying collateral, said...
The Federal Housing Finance Agencys lawsuit against UBS Americas and, by extension, more than a dozen other big banks, in connection with non-agency MBS purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will continue after a federal appeals court flatly denied UBS bid to dismiss the case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that denied UBS motion to dismiss the FHFAs suit as time barred. In the summer of 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits in Manhattan federal court against UBS and other big banks on behalf of the GSEs, alleging violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 for approximately $200 billion in MBS sold to Fannie and Freddie in the years prior to the mortgage market meltdown. The UBS appeal argument largely revolves...