The Federal Housing Finance Agency should give consideration to creating a mechanism to allow small mortgage lenders to more easily appeal GSE repurchase demands, according to one U.S. senator.In a letter sent last week to FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, said several of her small-business constituents have noted a “sharp increase” in repurchase demands over the last year.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have reluctantly directed their servicers to begin making payments next month in compliance with Chicago’s vacant property ordinance “under protest” as the GSEs’ conservator continues to fight the local legislation in court. Starting May 1, Fannie servicers will be required to include a written protest along with the ordinance’s $500 registration fee, according to a letter to servicers issued earlier this month. “All payments made to the city of Chicago, including vacant property registration payments, must be made ‘under protest’ by sending a written communication to the city with the registration fee,” explained Fannie. “This written communication must note that the Federal Housing Finance Agency determined that the registration fee does not apply to Fannie Mae, and that the registration fee is therefore paid under protest.”

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have generally made exceptions to their own rule regarding title impediments for properties with oil, gas, water or mineral rights, though new environmental disputes over hydraulic fracturing may change that, with “confounding implications for a particular region’s lenders,” said rating service DBRS. While contracts that allow for parties other than the property owner to utilize the land often complicate matters, the profitability of leases for resources like natural gas make those properties more attractive, because “the lease would generate income the borrower could apply...

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could end up on the hook for millions of dollars in unpaid property taxes as well as the targets of numerous legal complaints following a Michigan federal judge’s ruling that could force the GSEs to open their coffers to a plethora of revenue-starved local governments. Two weeks ago, U.S. District Court Judge Victoria Roberts granted Oakland County, MI, summary judgment in its lawsuit against Fannie and Freddie because the two GSEs failed to pay the transfer tax on deeds recorded by the state Register of Deeds Office, as required by Michigan law.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency is in the midst of a full and frank appraisal of the Treasury Department’s recently proposed incentive program to spur GSE principal reductions through the Home Affordable Modification Program, with a final answer to be forthcoming later this month, according to the agency head. For months now, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco has been the target of unrelenting political pressure from the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to employ mortgage principal reductions as a tool to modify underwater GSE loans.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities remained the preferred investment choice of the Federal Home Loan Banks during the fourth quarter of 2011, with a minor decline posted from the previous quarter, according to a new analysis by Inside The GSEs based on data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Ginnie Mae securities likewise posted a decline within the 12 FHLBank system during the three-month period ending Dec. 31, 2011. GSE MBS accounted for 69.6 percent of combined FHLBank MBS portfolios, down 2.1 percent from the third quarter of 2011. The Finance Agency’s data do not separately break out Fannie and Freddie volume or share.

President Obama this week signed into law a measure that, among other things, kills big bonus payments to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives for as long as the GSEs are subsidized by taxpayers. After nearly two months and some legislative positioning, Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012. Primarily, the STOCK Act bars House and Senate members and their staff from using non-public, inside information for personal benefit.However, an amendment to the bill which was passed on an overwhelmingly bipartisan margin in both houses of Congress prohibits the payment of bonuses over and above a GSE executive’s salary compensation while Fannie and Freddie remain in government conservatorship.

The inherent tensions between the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s dual role as both conservator and regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose “significant challenges” that may put the Finance Agency at cross purposes with its two missions, according to the FHFA’s official watchdog. A white paper issued by the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General last week offering its current assessment of the agency’s conservatorship of the GSEs cited the Finance Agency’s two main challenges as: attempting to advance the enterprises’ business interests while assisting distressed homeowners; and simultaneously serving as both conservator and regulator.

Three former Fannie Mae executives, including the company’s one-time CEO, have petitioned a federal judge to toss the securities fraud case the government filed against them late last year. Filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the motion to dismiss contends the Securities and Exchange Commission is thin on proof that the GSE, at the direction of the then top executives, failed to disclose to investors the companies’ exposure to subprime mortgages prior to the 2008 housing market crash.

Although it questions the appropriateness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac funding charitable activities while the two companies remain under government conservatorship, the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s official watchdog has concluded that the FHFA has the dissolution of the GSEs’ charity funds in hand. The recent report by the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General noted that at the time the conservatorships were established 3½ years ago, both companies had long-standing mechanisms in place to make “substantial contributions” to charitable organizations. In 2008, both GSEs’ charitable giving totaled $73 million.