Freddie Mac is rolling out a new version of an old mortgage security product designed to distribute the credit risk of borrowers paying back their mortgages to the private markets. The government-sponsored enterprise has begun marketing a new product, the Structured Agency Credit Risk security, which is designed to lay off credit risk to the private capital market on a scalable basis without impacting the TBA market or increasing counterparty risk. Freddie attempted a similar product in 1998 before deciding it was a failure. A Freddie spokesman said...
Rep. Mel Watt, D-NC, did himself no favors nor did he appear to win any new votes by turning in a lackluster performance at his confirmation hearing last week, but industry observers say President Obama’s nominee to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency could yet win Senate confirmation … with time. Both in his prepared testimony and during questioning by members of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, Watt placed a heavy emphasis on his biographical details, but he was light on mortgage-finance policy specifics. Republicans, as expected, politely hammered the Congressman on his technical qualifications, as well as his political independence, to serve a five-year term as the FHFA’s first permanent director.
Sponsors of the highly anticipated, bipartisan Senate legislation intended to reform the mortgage-finance system without Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac unveiled their final proposal last week.But with reform of the FHA more politically urgent and a more radical House bill waiting in the wings, even the Senate bill’s most avid industry supporters don’t expect the measure to gain much political traction in the near term.
Citigroup this week unveiled a $968 million legal settlement with Fannie Mae to cover current “potential future repurchase claims” for breaches of representations and warranties on 3.7 million first liens originated between 2000 and 2012. According to a statement issued by the nation’s sixth largest home lender, almost all of the money that will be paid to the GSE is “covered by Citi's existing mortgage repurchase reserves.”
Legislation filed in the House two weeks ago would require the Treasury Department to once again amend its agreement with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allow the GSEs to pay down the billions of taxpayer dollars the companies received while in government conservatorship.Under the Let the GSEs Pay US Back Act of 2013, H.R. 2435, – sponsored by Rep. Michael Capuano, D-MA – the GSE senior preferred stock purchased by the Treasury would no longer accrue dividends, as is the current practice.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac forked over a combined $66.4 billion in dividends to the U.S. Treasury at the end of June with more payments – though not as large – expected for quarters to come. Fannie paid the Treasury Department roughly $59.4 billion, while Freddie paid about $7.0 billion. A large chunk of Fannie's recent profits are tied to “deferred tax assets” which involve the recapture of money originally given to the GSE by Treasury to bolster its capital position.
A sharp downturn in refinance activity reduced Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s business volume during the second quarter of 2013, but the GSEs posted their strongest quarter in purchase-mortgage activity in four years, according to a new Inside The GSEs analysis. Fannie and Freddie issued $337.74 billion in single-family mortgage-backed securities during the second quarter, a 5.1 percent decline from the first three months of the year. The decline put an end to an upward trend in GSE production that took hold during the third quarter of 2012. Despite this, Fannie and Freddie business was up 20.0 percent over the first six months of last year.
Mortgages modified by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac performed about the same for a year after modification but Freddie’s loans had a slightly worse performance starting some 18 months after modification, according to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The OCC Mortgage Metrics Report for the First Quarter of 2013 noted that Fannie and Freddie loans each had a 17 percent re-default rate six months after modification. The two GSEs were similarly tied at the 12-month mark, each posting a 24.4 percent re-default rate. Daylight begins to crack between the two GSEs at 18 months, with Fannie’s rate at an even 28.0 percent compared to Freddie’s 28.2 percent. At 24 months, Fannie’s mods saw a 29.4 percent re-default rate compared to Freddie’s 29.9 percent. The gap widens at 36 months when Fannie stood at 35.2 percent compared to Freddie’s 36.3 percent rate.
Roughly $495 billion of residential MBS and non-mortgage ABS were issued during the second quarter of 2013, according to a new Inside MBS & ABS market analysis.
RSS