House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, last week pushed through committee his bill to replace Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with a new securitization utility without any government backing, but opponents of the bill warn that the measure will have a much tougher time getting votes on the House floor. The Protecting American Taxpayers and Homeowners Act, H.R. 2767, was approved by a 30-27 margin with all the committees Democrats and even two Republicans voting against it. Before last weeks 10-hour bill markup, House Democrats released their principles for housing finance reform. In addition to preserving the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, Dems aim to establish a system with an explicit government guaranty paid for by the private sector and maintain regulations that the House GOP wants to eliminate.
A pair of newly filed bills by a lone Senate Democrat would see the Home Affordable Refinance Program further expanded as a means to provide underwater homeowners with new refi options. The Rebuilding American Homeownership Act, S. 1375, would modify HARP to allow loans that lack a government guaranty to be refinanced through HARP. The bill would also direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to price for the risk that the GSEs would be assuming, so that the program has no net costs, as well as establish an automatic sunset for the program after 24 or 36 months.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency announced last week it has reached a settlement with UBS Americas for nearly $900 million to cover claims of alleged violations of federal and state securities laws regarding non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Under the terms of the agreement, the Swiss bank will pay some $885 million divided roughly in half between the two GSEs. UBS will pay Fannie approximately $415 million and $470 million to Freddie to settle claims related to residential MBS offerings between 2004 and 2007. The satisfactory resolution of this matter provides greater clarity and certainty in the marketplace and is in line with our responsibility for preserving and conserving Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs assets on behalf of taxpayers, said FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco.
A federal district court in Illinois did not err in dismissing a lawsuit by investors against a hedge fund over nearly $7 million lost in Freddie Mac stock before the GSE was forced into conservatorship, according to a recent ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court agreed with the lower court that the plaintiffs failed to present any valid cause of action.
Certain provisions in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed changes to its mortgage servicing rule conflict with Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s own servicing guidelines and should be amended, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In a comment letter, the Finance Agency cited the similar goals of the FHFA’s single, consistent set of servicing procedures established in 2011 to form the Servicing Alignment Initiative and the bureau’s 2013 Mortgage Servicing Final Rule.
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs this week approved bipartisan legislation to strengthen FHA solvency and oversight authority over lenders, paving the way toward dealing with the larger issue of housing finance reform. Introduced by Committee Chairman Tim Johnson, D-SD, and Ranking Minority Member Mike Crapo, R-ID, the FHA Solvency Act (S. 1376) passed by a vote of 21-1. The approved bill included...
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and their government conservator are all calling on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to amend proposed changes to its mortgage servicing rule because certain provisions would inhibit similar servicing goals put forth by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In a comment letter, the FHFA said its servicing alignment initiative has pushed for improved practices that are similar to the goals of the CFPB rule, but several provisions in the recently proposed amendments would actually make those goals more difficult to achieve. The four areas of the CFPB proposal that are especially important cover...
Policymakers should replace Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with mandatory mortgage insurance and a catastrophic guaranty from the federal government, according to a new paper from Promontory Financial Group, a consulting firm. The paper was prepared at the request of Genworth Financial and Promontory said the mortgage insurance firm didnt influence the recommendations. Under Promontorys proposal to reform the government-sponsored enterprises, private entities would both issue and guarantee their own mortgage-backed securities, private MI would be required on a loan-level basis for mortgages securitized in the new system, and a government agency would provide a back-up guaranty on the MBS payable only upon default by the MBS issuer. Our proposal is...
The Federal Housing Finance Agency withdrew a proposed rule it was forced to issue regarding Property Assessed Clean Energy programs after prevailing in court.