GSE shareholders lost their latest battle against the government’s preferred stock purchase agreement as the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear their case last week. After a lower court ruled against claims arguing the validity of the Treasury sweep of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits, investors hoped to plead their case to the high court. Plaintiffs, including Fairholme Funds, Perry Capital and other shareholders, filed a writ of certiorari last year asking the Supreme Court to intervene in their cases. Both Perry and Fairholme have large holdings of the GSEs’ preferred shares. Back in 2014, a judge for the District of Columbia U.S. District Court dismissed claims brought against the government saying that the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 gives...
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said the GSEs’ credit-risk transfer programs are a positive step towards reforming the housing-finance system and suggested a few improvements, including expanding the investor base. In a FRBNY report titled “Credit-Risk Transfer and De Facto GSE Reform,” the authors credit the CRT initiative for improving the stability of the housing-finance system and advancing a number of objectives critical to GSE reform. CRTs have reduced the GSEs’ exposure to mortgage credit risk without disrupting the stability of the secondary mortgage market, they said, adding that they have also created a growing new financial market for pricing and trading risk.
Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, wrote Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mel Watt demanding he explain why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will continue to make contributions to affordable housing funds while needing a draw from the Treasury to stay afloat. He called Watt’s refusal to automatically stop GSE payments to the funds “unjustifiable.” In the letter, the House Financial Services Committee chairman reminded Watt of his earlier statement saying he won’t make payments to the Housing Trust Fund and Capital Magnet Fund if a draw from Treasury is needed. In the wake of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the GSEs had to reduce their deferred tax assets by...
With three mortgage insurers providing about two-thirds of the mortgage insurance coverage to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Finance Agency Office of Inspector General warned of potential risk down the road. Meanwhile, mortgage insurers seek to confirm their place in housing-finance reform discussions. Although mortgage insurers are more stable today, emerging trends point to a number of potential risks to the GSEs that warrant monitoring. One of the OIG’s concerns is that relying on a small number of counterparties increases the GSEs’ exposure to any individual counterparty. The report noted that although six PMIs are approved to provide coverage for the GSEs as of the end of September 2017, three insurers provided the bulk of their coverage.
Concerns have begun to mount for the Senate housing-finance reform draft proposal being developed by Sen. Bob Corker, R-TN, as the Center for Responsible Lending and National Urban League warned the plan would cost more and deliver less. The groups published a new research paper on March 1 outlining how the proposed legislation would be a blow to affordable housing by replacing current public interest mandates with “weak incentives.”“A doubtful structure of guarantors awarded unenforceable duties is simply not in our nation’s best interest. Nor is supporting systemic changes that omit community banks, credit unions, and other small lenders,” said Mike Calhoun, CRL’s president.
Economists and real estate executives warn that getting rid of the GSEs’ affordable housing goals, as suggested in some housing-finance reform proposals, will most likely lead to fewer options for underserved borrowers. Currently, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have affordable housing goals that work in tandem to their duty-to-serve underserved markets mandates. But a draft reform proposal by Sen. Bob Corker, R-TN, would replace the affordable housing goals with a new fee-based incentive system.“A potential reduction in federal backing for home loans issued to underserved borrowers as a result of ongoing GSE reform efforts is likely to decrease lending in these communities,” said...
CRT Market Better Able to Warn of Downturn. The credit-risk transfer market created in recent years by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is better poised to warn of systemic risk than the MBS market was prior to the financial crisis, according to new research by Susan Wachter of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. The Wharton professor noted that the future structure of the housing-finance market, in particular the number of issuers of government-backed MBS, may change how the CRT market functions.A multiple-guarantor model, with each offering its own CRT deals, may be less liquid than the current market with just two issuers, Wachter suggested. Fannie Hires New Communications VP. Fannie Mae has hired Duncan Burns as vice president of...
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders who are contesting the government’s net worth sweep may have few options left now that the Supreme Court of the United States has rejected their plea for appeal of lower court rulings that went against them.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reduced their combined mortgage portfolios to $484.2 billion during the fourth quarter of 2017, according to an Inside MBS & ABS analysis.
RSS