Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and three federal agencies are cranking up existing efforts to dispose of the GSEs ample real estate owned inventory of homes into overdrive by seeking investors ideas for converting thousands of REO properties into rentals.Last week, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development put out a request for information on how best to sell GSE and FHA-owned REO properties.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lost less in the second quarter of 2011 than during the previous three month period and less than one year ago, but the two GSEs continue to struggle with a huge run of losses well into the fifth year with no end in sight.
A group of House Democrats wants the Obama administration to extend the forbearance period up to a year for unemployed homeowners with mortgages owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
A report issued late last week by the Federal Housing Finance Agency Office of Inspector General has concluded that the FHFA did nothing to subvert its role as Fannie Mae and Freddie Macs regulator when the agency negotiated the GSEs administrative responsibilities under the Treasury Departments Home Affordable Modification Program.However, the FHFA-OIG noted there was ample room for improvement in the Finance Agencys oversight of the GSEs financial agency agreement (FAA) with Treasury, which resulted in poor communication and differing expectations as to the payment and scope of the HAMP-related work that the GSEs performed.
A conservative, non-partisan public interest group is considering its options following a recent federal appeals court decision affirming the Federal Housing Finance Agencys right to withhold documentation revealing the extent of political campaign donations made by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.On Aug. 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court ruling against Judicial Watch.
AARP has filed a class action lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank and Fannie Mae in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco on behalf of reverse mortgage borrowers and their survivors in what it says is an attempt to head off illegal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage foreclosures and evictions.
One of the most important issues for mortgage lenders and homebuyers alike in the whole qualified mortgage/risk-retention/ability-to-repay debate is how much legal liability lenders will have over the mortgages they originate in the Dodd-Frank era. For policymakers, one of the biggest decisions they will have to make to bring certainty to that question is which legal standard to impose, a rebuttable presumption or a safe harbor.
The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is moving rapidly along with its integrated mortgage disclosure project, issuing a third iteration of disclosure prototypes and closing off the comment period on them in just the past two weeks since the last issue of Inside Regulatory Strategies went to press. This time around, the CFPB issued another pair of disclosures, named “Camellia” and “Azalea,” which would be used for mortgages with a balloon payment at the
Policymakers interested in pushing national mortgage servicing standards are right to make sure that homeowners who were harmed by abusive industry practices are compensated. However, there is still a tremendous amount of uncertainty in the housing and housing finance markets, and any servicing standards that are developed must address that if the weights that hold the markets back are to be cut lose and private capital comes back in full force, a top industry
AARP and two law firms recently filed a class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco against Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae on behalf of reverse mortgage borrowers and their survivors in an attempt to keep Home Equity Conversion Mortgage foreclosures and evictions in the state at bay.