Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, whos heading up the 50-state settlement talks with the nations top mortgage servicers over industry foreclosure practices, is defending the decision to proceed without the direct participation of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. In a letter to the New York delegation to the U.S. House of Representatives, Miller rejected the assertion that the state AGs had removed Schneiderman from the negotiation table. New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman voluntarily walked away from the negotiation table in June, Miller said.
Goldman Sachs will likely have no appetite to wade back into the mortgage servicing business anytime soon, following the enforcement action taken against it last week by the Federal Reserve Board a regulatory move that still leaves monetary penalties on the table and likely to be imposed before long. The action orders Goldman Sachs to retain an independent consultant to review foreclosure proceedings initiated by Litton Loan Servicing LP, Goldmans former mortgage servicing platform, that were pending at any time in 2009 or 2010. The review is intended to provide remediation to borrowers who suffered financial injury as a result of wrongful foreclosures or other deficiencies identified in a review of the foreclosure process, according to the Fed.
With the shelf life of the National Flood Insurance Program about to expire once again, the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee last week passed the latest program reauthorization legislation, the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act that includes a five-year extension of the NFIP along with various program reforms. This bill would reauthorize the program and its funding through 2016, phase in premium rates that more accurately reflect the risk facing a property, and allow for the NFIP to build reserves and modernize flood maps. The bill also requires that lenders provide to all purchasers a disclosure of the availability of flood insurance under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
Baron and Budd, a national plaintiffs law firm based in Los Angeles, is eyeing a possible class action against some top mortgage banks by investigating so-called equity accelerator programs, said to be offered by JP Morgan Chase, Citibank, Wells Fargo and numerous other banks and mortgage lenders. The programs are apparently being promoted as something that can help save substantial money on a home mortgage. However, the lawyers say banks are taking advantage of people enrolled in the program by failing to apply funds to the mortgage on the same day they are withdrawn from the customers accounts, meaning that consumers are essentially giving the bank a loan without their knowledge and ultimately saving no money on their home mortgage.
The Stauffer and Nathan, P.C. law firm of Tulsa, OK, recently filed a federal class action in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Oklahoma against Wells Fargo and Experian, Equifax and Trans Union. The complaint accuses Wells of engaging in illegal mortgage servicing practices and ramrod unlawful foreclosures and alleges the major credit bureaus participated in erroneous credit reporting due to their reckless failure to conduct independent investigations and just parroting the false and negative information supplied to credit bureaus by Wells Fargo. The plaintiffs contend Wells Fargo continues to engage in a free-for-all campaign to harass and disparage Oklahoma homeowners with unjustified foreclosure proceedings. They also claim abuse of process, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and numerous violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes.
Bank of Americas 2008 purchase of Countrywide Financial Corp. continues to be an albatross around BofAs neck, with U.S. Bancorp. filing suit against the largest lender in the land to compel it to repurchase mortgages sold by Countrywide back in 2005. U.S. Bancorp, which filed the lawsuit as a trustee on behalf of several unnamed investors, alleges breaches of representations and warranties, claiming Countrywide disregarded its own mortgage underwriting guidelines when it issued the loans at the center of the dispute. The 4,000 mortgages involved originally totaled $1.75 billion in principal. Countrywide agreed to buy back the loans within 90 days of the purchase date if any of the statements made in the loan contract were untrue, including an assertion that the loans complied with the banks underwriting guidelines, according to the complaint.
The National Association of Mortgage Brokers is tapping into national policymakers anxiety over job creation to press the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to rescind its loan originator compensation rule. Ever since the early April implementation of the Federal Reserve Boards Regulation Z Truth-in-Lending rule on steering and LO compensation, consumers have experienced a dramatic increase in costs on their mortgages, the NAMB said, and the regulation has become a great impediment on the vital service of mortgage lending throughout local communities. The group also complained about the overall regulatory compliance burden of a seemingly ever-increasing amount of regulations coming out of Washington, DC.
Alabama. The U.S. District Court for Alabama’s Eastern Division recently dismissed the borrowers’ counterclaim against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Merscorp in response to a Freddie Mac eviction action. In Freddie Mac v. Brooks, the government-sponsored enterprise filed an eviction action against the borrowers after the completed foreclosure sale. The borrowers responded by filing a counterclaim against MERS, Merscorp and Freddie, claiming wrongful foreclosure and alleging that the mortgage was invalid and unenforceable because
Federal Housing Finance Agency. HARP Being Re-Evaluated. The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Obama administration are working together to take another look at the current Home Affordable Refinance Program to see if they can conjure up ways to extend the benefits of this refinance product to more borrowers. FHFA is carefully reviewing the mechanics of the HARP program to identify possible enhancements that would reduce barriers for borrowers already otherwise eligible to refinance using HARP, said Edward DeMarco, the agencys acting director. If there are frictions associated with the origination of HARP loans that can be eased while still achieving the program's intent of assisting borrowers and reducing credit risk for [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac], we will seek to do so. Most creditworthy borrowers outside of the HARP program parameters and with positive equity should be able to refinance their mortgage through normal market mechanisms, he added. Indeed, since HARPs inception [Fannie and Freddie] have completed more than 1 million streamlined refinances outside of HARP and nearly 7 million standard rate and term refinances.
The Homeowners Consumer Center is urging the U.S. Congress to immediately resurrect the homebuyers tax credit to help stabilize residential real estate markets throughout the country and to stimulate job creat The reason the former attempt at a tax credit for homebuyers was not as successful as it could have been, is it was limited to first-time homebuyers only, the group said. We say give a $15,000 tax credit to anyone who is qualified to buy a house, including investors, and do it now.