The CFPB recently issued much-sought but quite limited guidance to the mortgage industry on marketing services agreements, emphasizing the legal and regulatory risks for lenders. “We are deeply concerned about how marketing services agreements are undermining important consumer protections against kickbacks,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Companies do not seem to be recognizing the extent of the risks posed by implementing and monitoring these agreements within the bounds of the law.” The guidance, in the form of a five-page bulletin, explains that, while marketing services agreements are usually framed as payments for advertising or promotional services, “in some cases the payments are actually disguised compensation for referrals. Any agreement that entails exchanging a thing of value for referrals of settlement ...

A cross-section of industry representatives and analysts were not very impressed with the long-sought guidance on marketing services agreements that the CFPB put out recently. Michael Barone, a director of legal and regulatory compliance at Lenders Compliance Group, a consulting firm in Long Beach, NY, said the guidance – which he characterized as very short and informal – “was an effort to get something out very quickly,” in response to all the congressional criticism that CFPB Director Richard Cordray received at the hands of critics on Capitol Hill. “It really does not have a lot of teeth at all,” he said of the bulletin. Further, the guidance doesn’t “tell us anything more than where we were an hour before this guidance came ...

A number of industry trade groups said that CFPB Director Richard Cordray’s determination earlier this year that PHH Corp.’s former mortgage reinsurance activities violated the anti-kickback provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act was wrong and ill-founded on multiple levels. Jointly submitting an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in PHH et al. vs. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the organizations argued that the director’s order cannot be reconciled with RESPA, the bureau’s governing regulations, or longstanding policy guidance. First, the directive contravenes the text, structure and purpose of RESPA Section 8(c)(2) by relegating it to “a mere rule of construction, rather than treating that provision as the exemption to liability that it ...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new guidance on mortgage services agreements has given the industry little confidence about such arrangements and likely helped push another major lender, Bank of America, to shutter its MSA ventures. BofA decided to the pull the plug on all marketing services agreements it has with realty firms, including RE/MAX. The bank told IMFnews, an affiliated daily service, that it will discontinue all “space rental agreement programs due to recent regulatory developments.” Its MSA agreements will end...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s decision to ignore more than 40 years of established interpretation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act’s anti-kickback provision would deprive consumers of the benefits of risk retention and do them further harm, warned an industry trade group in an amicus brief. The brief in support of the petitioner in PHH Corporation, et al., v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said allowing CFPB Director Richard Cordray’s decision to stand would increase closing costs, make an already lengthy closing period longer, and make the mortgage origination process more confusing for borrowers and lenders. Currently on appeal in federal appeals court in the District of Columbia, the decision issued by Cordray on June 4, 2015, relates...

Mortgage lenders have entered a new, unfamiliar zone of regulation with the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule, which became effective on Oct. 3. The Stratmor Group, a mortgage consulting firm, said reaching out to borrowers prior to loan closing increases borrower satisfaction significantly, which regulators may view as a positive indicator of good-faith efforts to comply with the complex new rule. “One aspect of TRID compliance is making sure that the customer ...

The CFPB and all of the prudential banking regulators will recognize the good-faith efforts of the mortgage industry to comply with the bureau’s Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule as of its effective date of Oct. 3, 2015. “During initial examinations for compliance with the rule, the agencies’ examiners will evaluate an institution’s compliance management system and overall efforts to come into compliance, recognizing the scope and scale of changes necessary for each supervised institution to achieve effective compliance,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray, in a letter to industry trade groups. “Examiners will expect supervised entities to make good-faith efforts to comply with the rule’s requirements in a timely manner,” the director continued. “Specifically,...

The full House of Representatives is expected to vote sometime this week on legislation that would provide a regulatory and legal safe harbor for mortgages originated under the CFPB’s Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule until Feb. 1, 2016. Speaking of the legislation at issue, H.R. 3192, the Homebuyers Assistance Act, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-CA, said, “This bipartisan bill provides certainty to businesses that are trying to comply with the rule as well as an opportunity to work out any implementation issues that come up.” One industry observer who anticipates a “big margin” vote indicated he expects the bill will split rank-and-file Democrats from their caucus leadership. Meanwhile, industry readiness continues to ...

Real estate, title and mortgage industry groups are doing more than lobbying Congress and the CFPB for relief when it comes to compliance with and enforcement of the bureau’s Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule. They are also continuing to work hard to get their own respective memberships as up to speed as possible before examiners show up on their doorsteps. For instance, the American Bankers Association sent a letter to member CEOs last week to assist executive management and line business managers in decision making as the industry completes final arrangements to comply with TRID. “Bankers are making assessments of systems readiness, staff training, capabilities of settlement services providers, and potential compliance risk ...

Mortgage Bankers Association President and CEO David Stevens again called for formal guidance from the CFPB on the legitimacy of marketing services agreements in the wake of some recent troubling developments after the bureau assumed enforcement of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. Speaking at the MBA’s recent 2015 regulatory compliance conference in Washington, DC, Stevens told a crowd of attendees, “We sent a letter to [CFPB] Director [Richard] Cordray weeks ago asking that the bureau simply clarify whether MSAs are considered acceptable and what constitutes an acceptable [agreement] if that’s the case. That was our question. We’re not saying we’re for them, against them; just please tells us if we’re going to ...